Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, recently selected as Kamala Harris’s running mate for the 2024 presidential election, is under fire for his alleged embellishment of military service records. The controversy resurfaced after details emerged from a 2007 press conference where then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi commended Walz for his service "on the battlefield." Despite Pelosi's claims, Walz, who served in the National Guard for 24 years, never saw combat, a fact he did not clarify during the event.
At the February 2007 press conference, Pelosi introduced Walz, a newly elected congressman at the time, as a "command sergeant major" who served his country both "in the classroom and on the battlefield." Walz, rather than correcting the Speaker’s misleading statement, proceeded to thank Pelosi for her recognition before moving on to other topics. This incident has now come back to haunt Walz as he steps into the national spotlight, with many questioning the integrity of his military service narrative.
FLASHBACK: Tim Walz thanked Nancy Pelosi at a press conference in 2007 in which she said while introducing him that "we appreciate his service on the battlefield."
CSPAN then identified Walz as an "Afghanistan veteran." pic.twitter.com/6HaKNyfKsf
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) August 9, 2024
Walz’s military record, while honorable, is devoid of direct combat experience. His deployments were primarily in non-combat zones, including postings in Norway and Italy in support of NATO forces and Operation Enduring Freedom, respectively. However, his political campaigns have repeatedly implied a more intense level of military engagement. For instance, in his 2006 congressional campaign, Walz's website and promotional materials referred to him as a "veteran of Operation Enduring Freedom," a technically accurate but potentially misleading statement given that he was not deployed to active combat zones in Afghanistan.
The controversy extends beyond the 2007 press conference. Walz has been accused of "stolen valor," a term used to describe individuals who exaggerate or fabricate their military service for personal gain. Critics argue that Walz’s failure to correct misrepresentations about his service, combined with his own vague statements, amounts to a calculated effort to enhance his military credentials. This issue has been particularly damaging among veterans and military families, who view the embellishment of military service as a grave offense.
This is the clip that will sink Tim Walz.
Here’s Nancy Pelosi thanking him for his service “on the battlefield” and discussing how he had to leave his students to go serve.
We now know none of that is true and Tim Walz was stationed in Italy, not in Afghanistan.
We also see… pic.twitter.com/3WWTGJEaOX
— Joey Mannarino (@JoeyMannarinoUS) August 9, 2024
Adding fuel to the fire, Walz has also been accused of overstating his military rank. While he often referred to himself as a "command sergeant major" during his congressional tenure, official records indicate that Walz retired as a sergeant major, a rank lower than the one he claimed. The distinction, though subtle, is significant within military circles, as it reflects a level of leadership and responsibility that Walz did not attain.
Furthermore, Walz’s decision to retire from the National Guard in 2005 has been questioned by some of his former colleagues. His retirement coincided with the impending deployment of his battalion to Iraq, leading to speculation that Walz left the service to avoid combat. Although Walz has denied these allegations, stating that he was unaware of the deployment at the time of his retirement, some remain skeptical, pointing to a 2005 campaign statement in which Walz acknowledged his battalion's readiness for deployment.
This controversy threatens to overshadow Walz's political achievements, including his tenure as governor of Minnesota, where he has been credited with passing significant legislation on healthcare, education, and infrastructure. However, as Walz steps onto the national stage as a vice-presidential candidate, his past military claims are likely to remain a focal point for critics, particularly within conservative circles.
The Harris-Walz campaign has dismissed the allegations as politically motivated attacks, arguing that Walz’s military service is a matter of public record and that any inaccuracies were unintentional. Nonetheless, the issue has already been seized upon by Republican opponents, who are eager to portray Walz as untrustworthy and willing to manipulate his military record for political gain.
TRUMP/VANCE 2024. THE ONLY CHOICE IF YOU WANT TO SAVE OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC!!!!